Amorepacific
Amorepacific remains a credible Top 10 beauty company because climate leadership and refill or return systems are moving forward, but the reporting chain for its latest sustainability data is less clean than the top-tier names above it.
Score
82
Industry
Beauty
Country
South Korea
Report year
2025
Badge
Eligible to use the sustainablereports badge
Score breakdown
Resource efficiency
81Collection and return systems plus bottle recovery progress are meaningful, though the circular story still feels more programmatic than fully scaled.
Impact on environment
86Renewable electricity and top-tier CDP scores are strong signals, especially for a major Asian beauty group.
Social responsibility
80Management diversity and responsible raw-material sourcing support the case, but the people-impact story is less differentiated than Natura or L'Occitane.
Economic benefits
79The sustainability strategy still supports premium differentiation, but the latest evidence is not packaged as transparently as the higher-ranked groups.
Certifications and signals
Evidence and sources
2025 Sustainability Report News Release
Amorepacific
Official news confirms publication of the 2025 sustainability report and highlights renewable electricity and carbon management progress.
View source2024 Sustainability Report PDF
Amorepacific
Current public download page still surfaces the 2024 report and gives category context on packaging, palm sourcing, and circular systems.
View sourceRelated reports
Related rankings
About us
Independent research. No brand sponsorships.
sustainablereports.org organizes public sustainability reports, certifications, and evidence into editorial research pages. We do not accept brand sponsorships, we do not sell ranking positions, and we do not offer paid inclusion.
Badge usage policy
Only brands that have earned a place in one of our “Top 10 sustainable products/brands” rankings may display the sustainablereports badge. Brands outside those rankings may not use it.
Editorial policy
Conclusions are not adjusted for partnerships, marketing budgets, or brand relationships. Rankings and company pages reflect only the quality of public disclosure and evidence available at the time of review.